Close Menu
  • News
  • Medical
  • Technology
  • Nanomaterials
  • Research
  • Blog
    • Nasiol.com
  • Contact
    • Tech7685@gmail.com
What's Hot

A new molecular model of bilayer graphene with higher semiconducting properties

May 31, 2025

5 Nanomaterial Innovations That Didn’t Deliver (Yet)

May 30, 2025

Scientists identify new 2D copper boride material with unique atomic structure

May 30, 2025
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Nanotech – Nanomaterials | Medical | Research | News Stories Updated Daily Nanotech – Nanomaterials | Medical | Research | News Stories Updated Daily
  • News
  • Medical
  • Technology
  • Nanomaterials
  • Research
  • Blog
    • Nasiol.com
  • Contact
    • Tech7685@gmail.com
Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
Nanotech – Nanomaterials | Medical | Research | News Stories Updated Daily Nanotech – Nanomaterials | Medical | Research | News Stories Updated Daily
Home»News»How should we govern nanotechnology?
News

How should we govern nanotechnology?

May 29, 2025No Comments5 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr WhatsApp Email
How should we govern nanotechnology?
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Telegram Email
Credit: Pixabay/CC0 Public Domain

There has been a lot of interest in recent years in governing new technologies, especially for AI. Yet, before the current hype in AI, there was nanotechnology and others before it. In his doctoral thesis, Nicholas Surber details the extensive politics, and their consequences, that have taken place across Europe to enable a successful development of nanotechnology. Surber defends his thesis on May 27.

What challenges do you focus on in your research?

Governing new science and technology is frequently talked about as a gap or pacing problem. That is, science and technology develop first, while the means to govern them come later, if at all. This is and remains a large challenge for nanotechnology due to its promised applications across the economy, large amounts of public funding and lingering questions about its (nano)safety to minimize environment and human health harms.

How do you address the problem?

My research begins from one simple point. To govern nanotechnology effectively, one must account for the politics that arise in how they determine which policies become possible, less possible, or perhaps impossible. Such governing has been dominated by technical discussions, technocratic or expert-led decision-making, and technical development of tools that offer solutions to this challenge by hiding their political aspects. In this way, governing nanotechnology has been seen as a gap to fill with more and more tools.

In order to analyze nanotechnology governing as politics, I rely on two steps.

One, I apply an idle theory of politics called sub-politics. Sub-politics is defined as politics occurring outside of the political system of government, like parliaments and assemblies. It is often associated with NGOs, environmentalism, social media and consumer-focused activism. I specifically look at the sub-politics between science, industry and civil society. This is organized around nanosafety and innovation in promoting innovation that is also safer and more sustainable.

See also  Deciphering Cellular Dialogues: Notre Dame's Breakthrough in Nanotechnology

Two, the research emphasizes an important shift in understanding the political system: from government to governance. During the last century, studying politics meant studying government. Multiple converging factors have increased the attention on governance, that focuses on responsibility of actors subject to regulation. This new array of approaches, without traditional compliance, is called soft law and soft regulation.

What are the main findings?

Here I will recount three main findings and the general logic that titles the thesis, “Too Enabling to Fail.”

First, I document a new type of organizing in civil society that I term promissory advocacy. This means an organization that combines elements of technical intermediaries (for example, consultancies like Research Institutes of Sweden), promissory forecasting organizations (as in, companies selling market predictions, like Gartner group), and advocacy organizations (for instance, with environmental NGOs like Greenpeace). I argue that nanotechnology reveals these converging elements of promissory advocacy.

Second, I understand the increase in voluntary tools for soft regulation through the paradox of a multiplication of uncertainty. In general, experts make tools and assessments that allow non-experts like politicians and managers to make decisions by simplifying the uncertainty in knowledge and expertise. The thesis looks at a few specific tools for nanotechnology. I suggest that perhaps a larger issue than making these tools is for the professionals to take decisions without this clarity. I explain that professionals face a multiplication of uncertainty.

Third, I diagnose a risk for future crises using the term promissory legitimation crisis. In recent years, crisis has resurfaced as a popular term, with notions of (permanent) permacrisis and (overlapping) polycrisis, often to describe climate change. In innovation, concrete outcomes are hard to predict, but investment is essential.

See also  Equity Crowdfunding in Nanotechnology — The Democratization of Innovative Investment

I examine the credibility of promised outcomes by stressing that commonly used nanotechnologies (nanomaterials), often hyped to bring the fourth industrial revolution, seem to be environmentally concerning and could become regulated. Nanotechnology is then vulnerable due to its promise of nanosafety through innovation to avoid a future promissory legitimation crisis.

I propose finally that nanotechnology, like other enabling technologies said to enable the economy, highlights a new political and economic logic: too enabling to fail. Since the financial crisis of 2008, there has been a large focus on economic concentration and too big to fail under financial capitalism. At the same time, there has been relatively less interest in the politics and economics of innovation, which has been analyzed as technoscientific capitalism where science and technology begin to drive economic growth. Too enabling to fail is a logic deserving our attention alongside too big to fail.

Discover the latest in science, tech, and space with over 100,000 subscribers who rely on Phys.org for daily insights.
Sign up for our free newsletter and get updates on breakthroughs,
innovations, and research that matter—daily or weekly.

What do you hope your research will lead to?

I hope the research can encourage more studies and policy emphasis on the governance and broader politics in innovation, like I have started with nanotechnology. Moreover, all too often, these problems are directed into calls for more scientific knowledge and for novel tools and frameworks. I believe lasting solutions will additionally require attention and alterations to the governing and governance structures of science, technology and innovation.

See also  Enhancing TB Vaccines with Nanotechnology

Given the dominant focus on voluntary responsibility, I expect it will remain an important topic given the structures and complexity of science and technology. Professionals are discussed as relevant actors, alongside experts, who need better incentives to pursue greater safety and sustainability in business settings. Still, responsibility only provides some early steps. I suggest that governing at a system level will be key to ensuring change.

Provided by
Chalmers University of Technology



Source link

govern Nanotechnology
Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

Related Posts

A new molecular model of bilayer graphene with higher semiconducting properties

May 31, 2025

5 Nanomaterial Innovations That Didn’t Deliver (Yet)

May 30, 2025

Scientists identify new 2D copper boride material with unique atomic structure

May 30, 2025

Nanoscale biosensor lets scientists monitor molecules in real time

May 30, 2025

The Future of Needle-Free Immunization

May 28, 2025

Nanoparticle-cell interface enables electromagnetic wireless programming of mammalian transgene expression

May 28, 2025

Comments are closed.

Top Articles
Research

Flinders Researchers Achieve Chemical-Free Gold Nanoparticle Production

News

Researchers demonstrate new way to ‘squeeze’ infrared light

News

Novel high entropy alloy nanoparticle catalysts for growing high-density carbon nanotubes

Editors Picks

A new molecular model of bilayer graphene with higher semiconducting properties

May 31, 2025

5 Nanomaterial Innovations That Didn’t Deliver (Yet)

May 30, 2025

Scientists identify new 2D copper boride material with unique atomic structure

May 30, 2025

New contact lenses allow wearers to see in the near-infrared

May 30, 2025
About Us
About Us

Your go-to source for the latest nanotechnology breakthroughs. Explore innovations, applications, and implications shaping the future at the molecular level. Stay informed, embrace the nano-revolution.

We're accepting new partnerships right now.

Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
Our Picks

A Photonic Device that Could Change Physics and Lasers Forever

June 3, 2024

Researchers develop efficient and accessible single-molecule platform for detecting various amylin species

January 13, 2024

New synthesis method enhances MoS₂ optoelectronic performance

July 22, 2024

Subscribe to Updates

Get the latest creative Nano Tech news from Elnano.com

© 2025 Elnano.com - All rights reserved.
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

Cleantalk Pixel